In 1981 the American Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published an article entitled Pneumocystis Pneumonia – Los Angeles. The article described cases of a rare lung infection, Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, in five young, previously healthy homosexual men4.
In 1982, the CDC used the term ‘acquired immune deficiency syndrome’ (AIDS) for the first time in an article, and provided the first case definition: ‘A disease at least moderately predictive of a defect in cell-mediated immunity, occurring in a person with no known cause for diminished resistance to that disease’4.
In the same year, the first case of AIDS was reported in South Africa in a white, homosexual male returning from a visit to the United States. Later that year, 250 random blood samples were taken from homosexual men living in Johannesburg, which showed an infection rate of 12.8%5. In 1985, the American National Cancer Institute announced that they have identified the cause of AIDS, a retrovirus they named the human T-lymphotropic virus type III4.
Later that year, the CDC revised their case definition and noted that AIDS is caused by a virus called HIV, which if left untreated can lead to AIDS. Another milestone in 1985 was the development of the first licensed commercial blood test to detect HIV4.
Back home, South Africa reported the first deaths from HIV/AIDS in 1985. In 1987, regulations were issued that added it to the official South African list of communicable diseases. A few months later, the first black South African was diagnosed with HIV5.
In 1988, the South African National Department of Health launched the AIDS Unit and National Advisory Group to promote awareness about HIV/AIDS. Efforts were lackluster to say the least, and by 1990 an estimated 74 000-120 000 South Africans were living with HIV5.
That same year, a national antenatal survey was conducted for the first time and found that 0.8% of pregnant women were infected.
In 1991 a national conference was held and a new body called the Networking HIV&AIDS Community of Southern Africa (NACOSA) was established to develop more comprehensive government policies. The government’s AIDS Unit was dismantled and replaced with the National AIDS Programme5.
By July 1991, the number of HIV/AIDS cases contracted through heterosexual sex was equal to those contracted through homosexual sex, a statistic that challenged widespread prejudice that HIV/AIDS was a ‘homosexual disease.’ From that point on, heterosexual sex became the dominant mode of HIV transmission in South Africa5.
Despite the proven efficacy of antiretrovirals (ARVs) to combat the growing HIV/AIDS epidemic, the South African government refused to roll-out zidovudine to pregnant women, claiming that it was too expensive5.
In 1997 the Inter-Ministerial Committee on AIDS was established with then deputy President Thabo Mbeki as chair. The following year Mbeki was elected President of South Africa. He was extremely vocal in his opinion that HIV did not cause AIDS, but rather that socioeconomic factors were the main drivers. Although his stance was widely criticised, it was supported by members of the ANC – albeit reluctantly5.
Mbeki and then Minister of Health, Dr Manto Tshabalala-Msimang’s views that food like garlic, lemon, African potatoes, and beetroot would be more effective than ARVs to prevent HIV transmission, made international headlines10.
At the end of 1998, the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) was launched by HIV-positive activist Zachie Achmat, and the battle for the provision of ARVs started in earnest, which would last for much of the following decade. In 2004, following a lengthy campaign by TAC and other AIDS activists, South Africa introduced antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the public sector5.